| 4 | 0 | 21 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
明确旅游资源共享的公平程度对推动旅游业的高质量发展具有重要意义。本研究基于“区域公平”理念,创新构建了全民共享潜力测算模型,定量计算了全国居民享有国家5A级景区功能的潜力值,并探讨了空间公平的分布特征及影响因素。结果表明:(1)随着出游距离的增加,全国共享潜力区的数量不断增长,且在不同的出游距离下,其分布特征不同;(2)市域及省域尺度下的共享潜力区均以“胡焕庸线”为界呈现“东高西低”的空间格局;(3)“胡焕庸线”和“博台线”共同构成了共享潜力公平性分区格局的骨架;(4)景区数量、经济水平、交通条件与距离衰减效应之间存在动态交互机制,共同决定了景区共享潜力的空间格局。该研究可为国家5A级景区的空间格局优化提供科学依据。
Abstract:Assessing the equity of tourism resource sharing is crucial for promoting high-quality tourism development. Based on the concept of "regional equity", this study innovatively constructed a model for measuring equitable public access potential. It quantitatively calculated the potential value for residents nationwide to enjoy the functions of national 5A-rated tourist attractions, and explored the spatial distribution characteristics of this fairness as well as its influencing factors. The results indicate that:(1) The number of equitable public access zones increases with travel distance, exhibiting distinct distribution characteristics under different distance thresholds.(2) At both municipal and provincial scales, the potential zones display a "higher in the east, lower in the west" spatial pattern, demarcated by the Hu Huanyong Line.(3) The Hu Huanyong Line and the Bole-Taipei Line jointly constitute the skeletal framework of the spatial equity partition.(4) A dynamic interactive mechanism exists among the number of scenic spots, economic development level, traffic conditions, and the distance decay effect, which jointly determine the spatial pattern of scenic spot sharing potential. This research can provide a scientific basis for optimizing the spatial layout of national 5A-rated tourist attractions.
[1] 黄秀琳.惠众与公平:未来旅游发展的终极诉求[J].中国软科学,2011(3):65-71.
[2] MADANIPOUR A.Marginal public spaces in European cities[J].Journal of Urban Design,2004,9(3):267-286.
[3] TSOU K W,HUNG Y T,CHANG Yaolin.An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities[J].Cities,2005,22(6):424-435.
[4] 魏璐瑶,潘奕如,陆玉麒.公平视角下南京市栖霞区“银发”服务设施空间配置现状及优化研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2024,40(6):69-77.
[5] 裴新蕊,郭鹏,吴佳莉,等.基于改进多交通模式两步移动搜索法的天津市公园绿地可达性评价[J].地理与地理信息科学,2024,40(4):74-79.
[6] 陈佑淋,余珮珩,李志刚,等.基于SDG11的城市绿地环境公平测度:以武汉市中心城区为例[J].地理与地理信息科学,2021,37(4):81-89.
[7] GUZMAN L A,OVIEDO D,RIVERA C.Assessing equity in transport accessibility to work and study:the Bogotá region[J].Journal of Transport Geography,2017,58:236-246.
[8] 黄应淮,刘小平,刘艳平,等.基于高德地图API的多种交通方式下城市公园时空可达性分析:以广州市海珠区为例[J].地理与地理信息科学,2018,34(6):50-57,1.
[9] 李康康,戢晓峰.景区综合交通可达性测度及其优化对策[J].长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(3):668-677.
[10] 贾文通,黄震方,鲍佳琪,等.基于高铁“门到门”旅行的景区可达性时空差异:以沪宁城际旅行为例[J].旅游学刊,2023,38(2):148-159.
[11] 朱政,朱翔.基于空间模拟的都市圈旅游景区综合交通可达性分析:以长株潭都市圈为例[J].旅游学刊,2024,39(1):130-146.
[12] 陈洁,陆锋,程昌秀.可达性度量方法及应用研究进展评述[J].地理科学进展,2007,26(5):100-110.
[13] 李平华,陆玉麒.可达性研究的回顾与展望[J].地理科学进展,2005,24(3):69-78.
[14] 许基伟,方世明,刘春燕.基于G2SFCA的武汉市中心城区公园绿地空间公平性分析[J].资源科学,2017,39(3):430-440.
[15] 陶卓霖,程杨.两步移动搜寻法及其扩展形式研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2016,35(5):589-599.
[16] 杨钦宇,徐建刚.基于引力可达性的公共服务设施公平性分析模型:以福建长汀为例[J].测绘与空间地理信息,2015,38(6):48-51.
[17] 李山,王铮,钟章奇.旅游空间相互作用的引力模型及其应用[J].地理学报,2012,67(4):526-544.
[18] DAI Dajun.Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in urban green space accessibility:where to intervene?[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2011,102(4):234-244.
[19] LUO Wei,WANG Fahui.Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment:synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region[J].Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design,2003,30(6):865-884.
[20] 吴必虎,唐俊雅.中国城市居民旅游目的地选择行为研究[J].地理学报,1997,52(2):97-103.
[21] 李山.旅游圈形成的基本理论及其地理计算研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2006.
[22] 方创琳.博台线:中国区域发展均衡线的重要功能与建设构想[J].地理学报,2020,75(2):211-225.
基本信息:
DOI:10.16191/j.cnki.hbkx.2026.02.011
中图分类号:F592
引用信息:
[1]张绍山,郭垚灿,刘超,等.区域公平视角下国家5A级景区全民共享潜力评价[J].河北省科学院学报,2026,43(02):85-92.DOI:10.16191/j.cnki.hbkx.2026.02.011.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(42471510)
2026-04-26
2026-04-26
